Showing posts with label Ram janmabhoomi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ram janmabhoomi. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Diwali fireworks & Ayodhya Ad that bombed!

It was a full page ad that reproduced the previous year’s agreement between VHP, mahants and the home minister, along with their signatures. Below was the government’s message stating that the government was fully committed to allow worship at Ayodhya as per this agreement.  I had personally over-seen the final version and given it to the chief of the creative team who was to get the pulls printed. Somehow at the printers end......Read on


By S Narendra
(Former Information adviser to PM. Spokesman of Government of India)

Every year, July–August months usher in the festival season that concludes around Deepavali. While Muslims and Hindus are in a festive mood and some may be praying in religious fervour (Chaturmasya, according to Hindu Panchangam), officials entrusted with the responsibility for ensuring security and public order spend sleepless nights and tense days. Their prayer is for this season to quickly pass off without any violent disturbance to public order. It was one such festival season in 1990, overly heated up by  Ram Janmabhoomi movement spearheaded by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its leader L.K.Advani. The latter had announced his Rath Yatra that was to enter Ayodhya in Faizabad district in UP around Dussera festival-also observed as Navratra.

To refresh our memories, BJP was extending outside support to the Janata coalition government headed by V.P.Singh. BJP, along with its supporting organisations like Vishwa Hindu Parishad (Ashok Singhal), Bhajarang Dal, mahants of various Ayodhya temples  had vowed to begin construction of Ram temple at Ayodhya at the place  where Babri-Masjid  stood from the 16th century.
This was fiercely opposed by the Babri Masjid Action committee. The dispute over its ownership and whether it was a Masjid or a Temple had reached the UP courts, including the Allahabad high court. The Central governments consistent stand for long has been that pending the courts’ verdict in the dispute, the two sides should respect the status quo. It was the constitutional responsibility of both the centre and UP government to ensure that no one was allowed to alter the status quo, as the matter was sub judice.
In fact, in 1989, the Ram Janma Bhoomi movement (had mobilised thousands of worshippers  or kar sevaks to bring ‘holy’ bricks from different parts of India to Ayodhya for starting the  construction of  Ram temple at the disputed Babri site. The Home Minister Buta Singh in the Rajiv Gandhi government had used his political skills to persuade the BJP and its supporting organisations to sign a document agreeing to offer worship and conduct a token temple construction (kar seva) away from the disputed site. The parties to the agreement had further committed themselves that they would not try to alter the status quo, as the matter was sub- judice. However, this time round in 1990 September –October, BJP and its supporters had decided to offer worship and undertake temple construction only at the disputed site, in violation of the previous year’s agreement. It was obvious that electoral politics, not so much religious fervour, was motivating L.K.Advani’s Rath Yatra.
Between Scylla and Charibdis: V.P Singh government was in a quandary. BJP was extending support from outside the government and any interference with Advani’s Rath Yatra was sure to result in its withdrawal of support. Negotiations with BJP and its allies to honour the previous year’s agreement ( not to enter the disputed site and conduct worship away from it ) that bore the signature of leaders of VHP ( Ashok Singhal) ,Bhajran dal, some mahants of Ayodhya and the Union Home Minister were unsuccessful.

BJP Ad Brinkmanship: BJP and its allies had begun to run a newspaper advertising campaign in support of their case for a temple at disputed site. A worried government wanted to counter this and tell the people that BJP and its allies were violating their own agreement of the previous year and could violate the court orders. The government could not oppose construction of Ram temple, nor could it alienate the minority community by allowing ‘kar seva’ at disputed site. And, it was decided to put the facts before the people in order to gain support for its stand. I was heading DAVP, the government’s advertising agency and was instructed to run a newspaper advertising campaign for the purpose
Counter Campaign: The government’s case to be put across through the Ads rested centrally on the Agreement, and the signatures of main people behind the temple agitation. The other message was that the government will be in contempt of the courts if it allowed   any ‘kar seva’ in the disputed area, but it was allowing ‘kar seva’ a little away from the site. The focus was on the legally untenable position of BJP, especially Advani, and to put the onus of the government going out of power on the  party. The time given to me for designing and running this campaign, like most such campaigns, was less than 24 hours! As the advertisements were dealing with a politically explosive subject that also touched on matters of faith and fervour, the contents of the Ads had to get political clearance at the highest level. Assisting the minister P. Upendra, the then I&B minister, I got the ad  design and messages  cleared by the prime minister late in the evening prior to Deepavali  festival day.
Advertising in Stone-age: Those were  the days before the PC era. The present generation in advertising  have no idea of how tortuous and time consuming was the job of Ad designs by hand and getting pulls (bromides) for manual dispatch to media. At the media end, it was equally a time consuming process to print the Ads. In the case of Urdu and small papers, DAVP had to get wooden blocks prepared (Now an Ad design can be prepared even on a smart phone and broadcast instantly to any number of media. Any number of iterations can be done in a jiffy). We had booked space in several hundred newspapers in various languages in several parts of the country. As the midnight hour approached, the newspapers began calling us frantically. I left office early morning, after seeing the final proof copy. My colleagues were entrusted with the job of getting the pulls from the press and dispatching them to newspapers.
What? Happy Deepavali?: I was woken up around 5.30 AM by a phone call. It was from P.Upendra, the minster. “Happy Deepavali, Sir”, I said. ”What bloody happy Deepavali. What have you done? Have you seen the newspapers? Do you know I cannot show my face to my colleague? Meet me at 8’O clock”, was the   minister’s   Deepavali greetings.
The newspapers had not yet come to my house. When they arrived later, I saw what had happened to our Ayodhya Ad campaign. It was a full page ad that reproduced the previous year’s agreement between VHP, mahants and the home minister, along with their signatures. Below was the government’s message stating that the government was fully committed to allow worship at Ayodhya as per this agreement.  I had personally over-seen the final version and given it to the chief of the creative team who was to get the pulls printed. Somehow at the printers end, the most vital part of the Ad, namely the signatures of the VHP, Mahants and of Home Minister appended at the bottom of the  agreement were missing. Without the vital signatures the Ad was a dud. Thus, the first round of our campaign had bombed.
As instructed I met the minister at this residence. The I&B secretary (late) Suresh Mathur was also present. Upendra was seething with anger and his voice showed: “What have you done about the mistake. Sack the officials responsible”. I submitted a hand written letter in which I had sought voluntary retirement, and spoke: “Sir: a grave mistake has occurred and embarrassed the government. I have let you down. I take full responsibility for this mishap. All my officials had worked very hard on the campaign and they are not responsible for the error’. Suresh Mathur, who was in no way involved in this also spoke: ’Sir, if Narendra is resigning, I will also put in my papers’. The minister was taken aback and his voice changed: ’Alright.  Alright. What can you do now to correct the mistake’? I informed him that I had already stopped the second round of the campaign and” I will personally go to the press to ensure .....”.
“Sir: Appeal for Peace and National Unity, and Go Out”

Advani’s Raht Yatra was stopped at Samastipur in Bihar by Laloo which led to violent clashes between the ‘kar sevaks’ accompanying the Yatra and the police in which several people died. Immediately, Atal Behari Vajpayee conveyed to the President that BJP had withdrawn support to V.P. Singh government. That meant the days of the government were numbered.
BJP began hitting back at the government with a new highly provocative display Ad campaign. The  full page Ads displaying  facts focused on how the governments were discriminating against the majority community, while favouring the minorities (‘appeasement’ to use BJP words). They focused on subsidies to Haj pilgrimage, official grants to minority institutions and similar facts. The Ads were meant to rally the majority and sure to divide people and spread disaffection among  them. A war room conference was held by the Janata leadership - V.P.Singh, M.M Syed, Upendra, Madhu Dandavate, George Fernandes, Ramakrishna Hegde. I was instructed to come up with a counter campaign, to be implemented from the  very next morning .I politely pointed out that the facts given in BJP Ads needed to be countered with facts and the government has to get me those facts .The Home Ministry officials were entrusted with the job of collecting those facts. In the mean while, R.K. Hegde offered to send me a well - known Ad agency representatives from Bombay to assist me in designing the ads.
The Author
Time was running out for me. To  make matters worse, the Home ministry admitted by the evening that the government had no facts to counter the BJP campaign.  Meanwhile, the private Ad agency had met Ramakrishna Hegde and the PM with their own campaign design that in no way touched upon the BJP facts. The design was replete with political messages attacking BJP and had content which could offend the majority community. As a government agency, I could not carry out an political campaign, and therefore, I came up with DAVP’s own messages emphasising the need for peace and communal harmony. It contained an appeal from the government leadership for cooling the political and social temperature. The minister Upendra took me to the PM, where other ministers had already assembled. I submitted that the moment was not conducive for further confrontation  through Ads. As the government was almost on the verge of demitting office, I said: “Sir: before going out of office,  It will be very dignified if the government issues an appeal for peace and national unity”.
Further, I suggested that the political campaign could be implemented through the party machinery. V.P. Singh quickly averred: ‘there is no need for any war in the media.”

In the next 24 hours, he left office!