By SPN Staff Writers in Breaking News Social Media
Facebook-owned WhatsApp is boasting it now has 800 million monthly active users.
WhatsApp CEO Jan Koum made the announcement in a Facebook post: “WhatsApp — now serving 800,000,000 monthly active users. Reminder for the press out there: active and registered users are not the same thing.”
The mobile messaging service has been enjoying rapid growth for months.
In January, Koum announced it had more than 700 million monthly active users sending more than 30 billion messages a day.
Facebook officially took ownership of WhatsApp in October, but the firm has continued on as a separate entity from the social media site.
Facebook was originally set to pay $19 billion for the popular app, forking over $4 billion in cash and approximately $12 billion worth of Facebook shares. The deal was also to include $3 billion in restricted stock units for WhatsApp’s founders and employees that will vest over four years. Facebook stock, however, increased from the time the terms of the deal were originally discussed, meaning the social network actually paid out about $21.8 billion.
It may be a colossal amount of money, but it appears it was money well spent given the ever-increasing popularity of WhatsApp. In fact, it’s user growth in the five years since its launch has easily surpassed that of Facebook, Gmail, Twitter and Skype — all of which are extremely popular Internet services or networks. (By arrangement with Site Pro News, Canada)
http://www.sitepronews.com/2015/04/20/whatsapp-continues-rapid-growth-sitting-at-800m-active-users/
Thursday, 23 April 2015
Narendra None-2: Of Onion tears and Scapegoats
By S. Narendra*
The Indian summer season from
April to August is always marked by shortages ranging from water and power
supply to essential items. Only thing in plentiful supply in such harsh months
is heat and sweat. It was no different in the summer of 1998 that had ushered
in the BJP - led national democratic alliance (NDA) government at the centre.
The political uncertainties following the fall of two Congress party supported
governments had also affected the general economic situation. The new
government was very much preoccupied with the country’s diplomatic isolation
following the nuclear explosion at Pokharn in May.
![]() |
| Narendra - The author is a former Spokesperson, Govt.of India & information adviser to PM) |
Around the month of June, media
was reporting sudden shortages of edible oil in some areas; sugar prices were
inching up, along with those of vegetables as well. Taking note of such media
reports, I met the then finance minister who heads the cabinet committee on
prices and requested him to hold an early meeting of this committee and review
the situation and announce measures to deal with shortages and the price rise.
Eco-system of Prices and PR: The cabinet committee on prices has as its
members the ministers in charge of Food, Agriculture, Civil Supplies and Commerce.
Some other ministers are co-opted as and when required. After reviewing the
supply position of essential commodities like edible oil, pulses, wheat, rice, sugar
and coarse grains like ragi, bajra and jowar,
the committee decided on improving the supply either by increasing the
release of any of the commodities available in government agencies like the Food Corporation
of India or through import.
Generally, import of agri-commodities
is beset with difficulties because the domestic suppliers oppose it as imports
tend to depress prices. The trader lobbies are also not very supportive of
imports as they depress prices and profits. Another factor complicating the
import option is that supplies may not be available readily. Since it is a spot
purchase, unlike a forward deal, the prices tend to be high. Parties in the
opposition become another pressure group against imports, and always ready to
allege lack of transparency and underhand dealings in imports. The farmers and
supplier lobbies of different countries are another factor to deal with. They
also use the political and media channels for scuttling each other’s chances.
They also freely make use of the brigade of allegation makers. It is not
unusual for different departments to take opposing stands for protecting their
turfs. For example, the agriculture ministry would like to project itself as
the friend of the farmer and would argue that the import price should not
exceed the minimum support price that had been offered to the Indian farmers.
Some of the states, which grow large quantities of a particular commodity such
as wheat, also jump into the fray for protecting their farmer’s interests.
In any information management,
preemption is important. Once the price rise panic button is pushed, it feeds
on rumour and there could be a run on supplies. Traders tend to hoard, creating
further shortages. The convening of the cabinet committee meeting itself could
send a signal that there would be a quick government response. In some
situations, it could raise unnecessary expectations. Therefore, it is very
essential to ensure that the meeting deliberations are carefully released to
the media. Serious divergence in the views of the members needs to be briefed
openly rather than allowing selective leaks. From a policy management
perspective, it is management of politics of shortage and relevant information
in public space.
Onion Tears: Back to the summer of 1998. The situation was
complicated by the fact that several states in the north, including Delhi, were
facing elections around October. Having criticized from opposition benches for
the successive governments’ failure to check price increases, BJP wanted to
show that they could deal with it better than its predecessors.
Even while it was grappling with
the general price rise, onion supplies were going out of the market. Onion in
the north Indian cuisine is not just a vegetable: it is an essential ingredient
as masala in cooking (more so in the case of non-vegetarian cuisine). In 1980,
a similar shortage had led to the defeat of the then central government. The
onion shortage had started to attract the maximum protest from the people and
legislators, who were quick to make it their political capital.
Facts had showed that there was
no shortfall in onion cultivation. It was obvious that there was onion hoarding
at suppliers end. I approached the PM with a note that the onion shortage was
becoming a poll issue, and the government was being painted by the opposition
as pro-trader and hence, was not in favour of de-hoarding operations. Although
BJP was controlling the Delhi government, it was not acting against hoarders.
In the meanwhile, the blame game
had broken out between ministries. Instead of the cabinet committee, the full
cabinet meetings were held for dealing with the onion crisis. In a bizarre
step, government banned the export of ‘rose onion’ or sambar onion grown in
south India. This particular onion was not in short supply, and was not a
substitute for its large sized onion cousin. Rose onion is exported mostly
from Tamil Nadu to Singapore and Malaysia which have a sizeable south Indian
population.
After protests from its Tamil
coalition partner in a cabinet meeting, this ban was lifted. There were some
very odd suggestions by senior cabinet ministers for import of white )or salad)
onion from Europe by air cargo. When bureaucrats tried to educate them about
the fact that the continental variety was unsuitable for Indian onion masala as
it was not suffiently pungent, they were snubbed. Suggestions for anti-hoarding
operations even as a symbolic gesture were out of favour.
Information management in such a
medley was a difficult operation. Individual ministers were allowed to air
different views to media on how to deal with the situation. It was forgotten
that unity of purpose is signified by unity of voice. The messengers of bad
news became the targets. First to be replaced was the food and
civil supplies secretary. As government spokesperson, I was dubbed as
ineffective in dealing with media
criticism.
Search for Scapegoats: Adding to the negative perception were other
developments like attacks on minority places of worship and
faith leaders. Suggestions that the center should come out with condemnation
of such attacks did not find favour. Advice
tendered in writing that the new government should initiate steps to allay the
apprehensions of the minorities and announce steps for their economic
inclusiveness were ignored. The party
lost power in Delhi and most of the states where elections were held. And, onions began to flow back into the market
soon after. And the search for
scapegoats, such as the government PR and media relations set up headed by me,
gathered momentum. Rest is history!
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
Duplicate Modi @ Press Club's 'OUCH' Awards and some for crazy media moments!
MUMBAI, April 20, 2015: : Subramanian Swamy, Rahul Gandhi, BBC and Shobhaa De, who are among recipients of the Mumbai Press Club's inaugural ‘Golden Ouch’ Awards. This is the prize whose winners might say 'Ouch', not cheese, while posing for prize photographs!
On Monday, eminent journalists Bachi Karkaria and others, on behalf of the Mumbai Press Club, gave away the ‘'prestigious' Ouch Awards in 14 categories for the craziest moments in media at a glittering function anchored by stand-up comedian Anuvab Pal. The evening of good-humored satire was a prelude to the more serious Mumbai Press Club RedInk Awards on April 30, 2015 that celebrate the finest in Indian journalism.
With outrageous statements a near-daily phenomenon, and outrage of many varieties a staple of the daily news cycle on mainstream as well as social media, the Press Club felt it was about time to honour the national champions in this new and burgeoning field with awards. Besides, there are awards for everything and given to all and sundry for any old nonsense, so why not yet another award for some real, quality nonsense?
Competition was stiff in many categories, but nowhere more so than in the race for the person who spoke most strongly in retarding the cause of women, for which the list of nominees was very, very long. In the end, Hon Minister Giriraj Singh won this award despite stiff competition from Abu Azmi, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Tapas Pal, and many others.
However, there was very little competition in some categories, such as "Leadership in Absentia", for which Rahul Gandhi was the runaway winner. The only other name that came up was Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, but since the awards are for recent achievements, Mr Gandhi won this award by a comfortable majority of jury votes.
Only two categories were decided unanimously with no other name even mentioned. One was Dr Subramanian Swamy, who won the Ouchie for Lifetime Achievement effortlessly. Dr Swamy has been given this prize for his tireless efforts in the field of "consistently and eloquently delivering highly provocative statements". His contributions towards inventing a whole new lexicon of outrage and abuse were deemed matchless. A surprise pulled off with great elan was 'Narendra Modi' double Vikas Mahante receiving the award on behalf of 'Subramanin Swamy'.
Mr Arvind Kejriwal, too, swept the award for Transparency in Public Life with no competition, thanks to this tweet: "Running 102 fever since yesterday. Severe loose motions. Sad that i won't be able to attend office today."
We were happy to recognize Mr Kejriwal's peerless efforts in extending transparency that extended to letting the whole country know about the state of his stomach. His tweet went where no sting video has ever gone.
It was wonderful to have such a distinguished list of winners from across the political spectrum in our very first awards. Awardees also span a remarkable range of educational achievements, from former Harvard professor Dr Swamy to IITian Mr Kejriwal to Dr Sakshi Maharaj, who apparently holds a Ph.D from a Sanskrit institute in Varanasi. We wonder if any other award in India so accurately reflects the variegated wisdom of our leaders.
The absolute howlers of the evening included a 'Presswalla' dhobi picking up the award for General V K Singh, Sharad Yadav's 'masseur' standing in for the award and a white-uniformed Taj Hotel driver being mistaken for a navy man and forced on stage as an 'unwilling representative' of Coast Guard DIG B K Loshali.
The media, too, received a small share of honour. Apart from clarifying the true meaning of the word "presstitute", which we realized was a mash of the words "press+destitute", we were also pleased to recognize the contributions of BBC in science reporting and the Hindustan Times in caption writing.
Unity in diversity is truly what makes India a great place, especially for the Golden Ouch awards. We look forward to honouring more stalwarts of outrage and foot-in-mouth in years to come.
………………………………………………………………………….
COMPELTE LIST OF OUCH AWARDEES WITH THE CITATIONS:
1. Golden Ouch For Transparency in Public Life.
Citation: For his evangelism in pursuing transparency and detoxification of self and the 'body politic' – and for his great progress from singing to stinging and some very surprising mud-slinging!
Winner: Arvind Kejriwal for his tweet on loose motions.
2. Golden Ouch For Leadership in Absentia
Citation: For going on extended vacation when the ‘party’ needs him most, for staying away from parliament at its most critical moments, for his enormous vocabulary of two key words: ‘women’s empowerment’!
Winner: Rahul Gandhi.
3. Golden Ouch For Advancing The Cause Of Women.
Citation: For excelling in the field of gender prejudice in the face of enormous domestic competition, and for successfully hurting the sentiments of a friendly African nation.
Golden 'Ouch' for Advancing the Cause of Women (and For Improving Foreign Relations
Winner: Honourable Minister Of State For Micro, Small And Medium Enterprise Giriraj Singh
AND JOINT GOLDEN OUCH WINNER
For crudely changing the complexion of parliamentary discourse by his racially-charged comments on the skin of South Indian women and his response to the criticism of HRD Minister SmritiIrani
Winner: Honourable JD(U) Chief, Sharad Yadav
4. Silver Ouch For Advancing the Cause of Women
Citation: For their consistent, unstinting commitment to the cause of misogyny and patriarchy despite the valiant battles being fought for independence and respect by the women of India and their supporters.
WINNERS: Tie between two defence lawyers M.L.Sharma and A.P.Singh in the Nirbhaya case.
5. Golden Ouch For Confession of the Year.
Citation: For either shooting down a Pakistani boat or simply shooting his mouth off – using ‘biryani’ again as a new metaphor for Indian hospitality.
Winner: Coast Guard DIG, B.K. Loshali
6. Golden Ouch For Confession of the Year – Part 2
Citation: For his extraordinary morality and misplaced sense of pride in cooking up a 'biryani lie' to build public opinion against a prisoner on death row and thus expediting his execution.
Winner: Special Public Prosecutor, Ujjwal Nikam
7. Golden 'Ouch' for Best Science Reporting (Rising to the Occasion!)
Citation: For provoking and arousing laughter and embarrassment around a serious scientific phenomenon by alluding to a male sexual phenomenon that is best not talked about.
Winner: THE BBC for calling the Large Hadron Collider the "Large Hardon Collider"
8. Golden 'Ouch' for Best HISTORY Reporting
Citation: For insisting that Indians flew planes centuries before the Wright Brothers (and Air-India), that these planes flew between nations and planets, that they flew forwards, backwards and sideways –– and above all, that these were no flights of the imagination.
Winner:: Captain Anand J. Bodas for Educating the Masses on India’s Aeronautical Achievements in Vedic Times
9. Golden 'Ouch' for his ‘labours’ in Family Planning
Citation: For asking women of a certain religion to labour' their entire adult lives producing babies and thus working tirelessy for the cause of resurgent majoritarianism.
Winner: Sakshi Maharaj For Urging Hindu Women To Have More Children
10. Golden 'Ouch' for the most Non-Violent Statement
Citation: For having an instant opinion on every issue and for his sweeping attacks as ‘imperialist collaborator’ on the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, and of the founder of the Indian National Army, Subash Chandra Bose.
Winner: FORMER SUPREME COURT JUDGE and FORMER CHAIRMAN, PRESS
COUNCIL OF INDIA, MARKANDEY KATJU, ON GANDHIJI
11. Golden Ouch For A Newspaper Blooper
Citation: For the best caption in the print media that outlines the care and detail that goes into addressing the photographs that accompany news items.
Winner: HT for referring to the Shakti Mills rape convicts and showing a Chinese trade delegation photo.
12. Joint Golden 'Ouch' for the best criticism of the press
Citation: For hurting the sentiments of commercial sex workers by calling media people "presstitutes". General V.K. Singh for hastily coining the word, and Justice Katju for endorsing it with his usual efficiency.
Winner: Gen VK Singh & Justice Markandey Katju
13. Golden 'Ouch' for Food Critic of the year
Citation: For a remark in delightful poor taste, elevating the lowly American popcorn above the thundering all-conquering indigenous warrior taste of VADA-PAO and MISAL.
Winner: Shobhaa De
14. Golden Ouch Lifetime Achievement
Citation: For consistently and eloquently delivering highly provocative statements with exquisite sophistry, confounding both enemies and allies alike
Winner: Subramaniam Swamy
On Monday, eminent journalists Bachi Karkaria and others, on behalf of the Mumbai Press Club, gave away the ‘'prestigious' Ouch Awards in 14 categories for the craziest moments in media at a glittering function anchored by stand-up comedian Anuvab Pal. The evening of good-humored satire was a prelude to the more serious Mumbai Press Club RedInk Awards on April 30, 2015 that celebrate the finest in Indian journalism.
With outrageous statements a near-daily phenomenon, and outrage of many varieties a staple of the daily news cycle on mainstream as well as social media, the Press Club felt it was about time to honour the national champions in this new and burgeoning field with awards. Besides, there are awards for everything and given to all and sundry for any old nonsense, so why not yet another award for some real, quality nonsense?
Competition was stiff in many categories, but nowhere more so than in the race for the person who spoke most strongly in retarding the cause of women, for which the list of nominees was very, very long. In the end, Hon Minister Giriraj Singh won this award despite stiff competition from Abu Azmi, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Tapas Pal, and many others.
![]() |
| Duplicate Modi - Vikas Mahanta - sharing some lighter moments at the Press Club's Ouch awards |
However, there was very little competition in some categories, such as "Leadership in Absentia", for which Rahul Gandhi was the runaway winner. The only other name that came up was Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, but since the awards are for recent achievements, Mr Gandhi won this award by a comfortable majority of jury votes.
Only two categories were decided unanimously with no other name even mentioned. One was Dr Subramanian Swamy, who won the Ouchie for Lifetime Achievement effortlessly. Dr Swamy has been given this prize for his tireless efforts in the field of "consistently and eloquently delivering highly provocative statements". His contributions towards inventing a whole new lexicon of outrage and abuse were deemed matchless. A surprise pulled off with great elan was 'Narendra Modi' double Vikas Mahante receiving the award on behalf of 'Subramanin Swamy'.
Mr Arvind Kejriwal, too, swept the award for Transparency in Public Life with no competition, thanks to this tweet: "Running 102 fever since yesterday. Severe loose motions. Sad that i won't be able to attend office today."
We were happy to recognize Mr Kejriwal's peerless efforts in extending transparency that extended to letting the whole country know about the state of his stomach. His tweet went where no sting video has ever gone.
It was wonderful to have such a distinguished list of winners from across the political spectrum in our very first awards. Awardees also span a remarkable range of educational achievements, from former Harvard professor Dr Swamy to IITian Mr Kejriwal to Dr Sakshi Maharaj, who apparently holds a Ph.D from a Sanskrit institute in Varanasi. We wonder if any other award in India so accurately reflects the variegated wisdom of our leaders.
The absolute howlers of the evening included a 'Presswalla' dhobi picking up the award for General V K Singh, Sharad Yadav's 'masseur' standing in for the award and a white-uniformed Taj Hotel driver being mistaken for a navy man and forced on stage as an 'unwilling representative' of Coast Guard DIG B K Loshali.
The media, too, received a small share of honour. Apart from clarifying the true meaning of the word "presstitute", which we realized was a mash of the words "press+destitute", we were also pleased to recognize the contributions of BBC in science reporting and the Hindustan Times in caption writing.
Unity in diversity is truly what makes India a great place, especially for the Golden Ouch awards. We look forward to honouring more stalwarts of outrage and foot-in-mouth in years to come.
………………………………………………………………………….
COMPELTE LIST OF OUCH AWARDEES WITH THE CITATIONS:
1. Golden Ouch For Transparency in Public Life.
Citation: For his evangelism in pursuing transparency and detoxification of self and the 'body politic' – and for his great progress from singing to stinging and some very surprising mud-slinging!
Winner: Arvind Kejriwal for his tweet on loose motions.
2. Golden Ouch For Leadership in Absentia
Citation: For going on extended vacation when the ‘party’ needs him most, for staying away from parliament at its most critical moments, for his enormous vocabulary of two key words: ‘women’s empowerment’!
Winner: Rahul Gandhi.
3. Golden Ouch For Advancing The Cause Of Women.
Citation: For excelling in the field of gender prejudice in the face of enormous domestic competition, and for successfully hurting the sentiments of a friendly African nation.
Golden 'Ouch' for Advancing the Cause of Women (and For Improving Foreign Relations
Winner: Honourable Minister Of State For Micro, Small And Medium Enterprise Giriraj Singh
AND JOINT GOLDEN OUCH WINNER
For crudely changing the complexion of parliamentary discourse by his racially-charged comments on the skin of South Indian women and his response to the criticism of HRD Minister SmritiIrani
Winner: Honourable JD(U) Chief, Sharad Yadav
4. Silver Ouch For Advancing the Cause of Women
Citation: For their consistent, unstinting commitment to the cause of misogyny and patriarchy despite the valiant battles being fought for independence and respect by the women of India and their supporters.
WINNERS: Tie between two defence lawyers M.L.Sharma and A.P.Singh in the Nirbhaya case.
5. Golden Ouch For Confession of the Year.
Citation: For either shooting down a Pakistani boat or simply shooting his mouth off – using ‘biryani’ again as a new metaphor for Indian hospitality.
Winner: Coast Guard DIG, B.K. Loshali
6. Golden Ouch For Confession of the Year – Part 2
Citation: For his extraordinary morality and misplaced sense of pride in cooking up a 'biryani lie' to build public opinion against a prisoner on death row and thus expediting his execution.
Winner: Special Public Prosecutor, Ujjwal Nikam
7. Golden 'Ouch' for Best Science Reporting (Rising to the Occasion!)
Citation: For provoking and arousing laughter and embarrassment around a serious scientific phenomenon by alluding to a male sexual phenomenon that is best not talked about.
Winner: THE BBC for calling the Large Hadron Collider the "Large Hardon Collider"
8. Golden 'Ouch' for Best HISTORY Reporting
Citation: For insisting that Indians flew planes centuries before the Wright Brothers (and Air-India), that these planes flew between nations and planets, that they flew forwards, backwards and sideways –– and above all, that these were no flights of the imagination.
Winner:: Captain Anand J. Bodas for Educating the Masses on India’s Aeronautical Achievements in Vedic Times
9. Golden 'Ouch' for his ‘labours’ in Family Planning
Citation: For asking women of a certain religion to labour' their entire adult lives producing babies and thus working tirelessy for the cause of resurgent majoritarianism.
Winner: Sakshi Maharaj For Urging Hindu Women To Have More Children
10. Golden 'Ouch' for the most Non-Violent Statement
Citation: For having an instant opinion on every issue and for his sweeping attacks as ‘imperialist collaborator’ on the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi, and of the founder of the Indian National Army, Subash Chandra Bose.
Winner: FORMER SUPREME COURT JUDGE and FORMER CHAIRMAN, PRESS
COUNCIL OF INDIA, MARKANDEY KATJU, ON GANDHIJI
11. Golden Ouch For A Newspaper Blooper
Citation: For the best caption in the print media that outlines the care and detail that goes into addressing the photographs that accompany news items.
Winner: HT for referring to the Shakti Mills rape convicts and showing a Chinese trade delegation photo.
12. Joint Golden 'Ouch' for the best criticism of the press
Citation: For hurting the sentiments of commercial sex workers by calling media people "presstitutes". General V.K. Singh for hastily coining the word, and Justice Katju for endorsing it with his usual efficiency.
Winner: Gen VK Singh & Justice Markandey Katju
13. Golden 'Ouch' for Food Critic of the year
Citation: For a remark in delightful poor taste, elevating the lowly American popcorn above the thundering all-conquering indigenous warrior taste of VADA-PAO and MISAL.
Winner: Shobhaa De
14. Golden Ouch Lifetime Achievement
Citation: For consistently and eloquently delivering highly provocative statements with exquisite sophistry, confounding both enemies and allies alike
Winner: Subramaniam Swamy
Monday, 20 April 2015
Top DD official appreciates PRapport
MUMBAI, April 20, 2015: "Wow, very nice," said Mr C K Jain, Dy. DG - PR & Publicity and International Relations at Doordarshan as he viewed PRCI e-mag PRapport today.
Mr Jain, who made a surprise visit to PRCI-Mumbai, took keen interest in the e-mag.
PRCI President BNK explained to Mr Jain the salient features of the organization and the recent initiatives.
PRCI sought DD’s help and Mr Jain’s support. He nodded and said: “Let’s see what we can do together.”
Think beyond Yourself, says Rajashree Birla - A PRapport Exclusive!
- Mrs.
Rajashree Birla, Chairperson, Aditya Birla Centre for Community Initiatives and
Rural Development, ‘In Conversation with Dr. Pragnya Ram’
I have had
the privilege and honour of working with Mrs. Rajashree Birla since 1997. In my
CSR portfolio, she is the dream boss. It has been, and continues to be, a great
learning experience.
There is
something very touching about her tenacity. She leads with a single-minded
focus — whatever it takes to lift the poor out of their poverty, she does in
her own way. Compassion is the only currency that counts. It’s not just about
our Group. Her gaze is fixated at the nation. Rajashreeji’s vision is to help
raise the Human Development Index of India, which today stands at a lowly 136,
even though we are on the intellectual map of the world. For her, it’s not
about choices. For her, it’s a duty.
She does not
allow any baggage of the past to disturb her calm. Never a slighting word, no
railing, no matter what the provocation — this is yet another ethereal quality
of Rajashreeji. A karmayogini, she follows the philosophy of hope. An evolved,
reflective, iconic leader, she is by nature endowed with a very sunny
disposition and an optimistic, can-do attitude, always focused and forever
willing to learn afresh. She is a great role model for women per se. The
impact, in qualitative and quantitative terms, is awesome.
Under
Rajashreeji’s leadership, we have laboured hard to make her dream of freedom
from poverty come true in some of our model villages in Rajasthan, Madhya
Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Gujarat. You can see the changed face of
the villages. From abject poverty to meeting the necessities of life. From
dependency to freedom. From backwardness to progress — in more ways than one.
In most of the villages where we are working, our committed teams have
endeavoured to bring in change. There is a palpable difference. Tens of
thousands of villagers now seem self-assured, confident and happy at being able
to move towards a sustainable livelihood. There is new found dignity among them
as they celebrate a new life.
To ask
Rajashreeji about our CSR projects, in one’s view, would be a tad superficial.
All of you are aware of her stewardship. So one has opted to present different
facets of her prismatic persona.
Your philosophy of life
Simple — live
and let live. Today, I am about 90 per cent successful in living this
philosophy day in and day out. I believe that this ‘live and let live’
principle embodies the philosophy of tolerance. It helps you recognise that
every individual is distinct, different from you, and has the right to his or
her own views and attitude.
I am also a
great believer in self-acceptance. Accepting yourself unconditionally,
believing in yourself, is very important. Many times people tick themselves off
because they have not measured up to their image of themselves. If it is not
for want of effort, you should just let it pass by. I think one has to learn to
be kind and gentle to oneself. You must accept yourself as you are. And my mind
is like a blank slate. No baggage of yesterday.
“Think beyond yourself”. Have heard
you say so often. Elaborate.
Think beyond
yourself. Recall Satya Nadella’s email to employees when he stepped in as CEO
at Microsoft. He wrote, “I truly believe that each of us must find meaning in
our work. The best work happens when you know that it’s not just work, but
something that will improve other people’s lives.” Reach out to all those, who
are not as blessed or privileged as we all are. Work to make a difference to
them also. Leave behind a legacy, that of a good, honest human being who cared
for others.
Your favourite phrase?
“This too
shall pass” — just four words which tell you that everything in life is
ephemeral. Nothing lasts forever. In any situation, it holds true, and gives
enormous strength, resilience and hope. So it helps you go through the rough
times without despairing and good times without being too overwhelmed.
Your most memorable moment?
When Kumar
Mangalam cleared his CA in the first attempt and was among the toppers, I was
over the moon. At that point in time, there were no coaching classes for
students who aspired to do their CA. I know of many youngsters who cleared the
CA in the third attempt. Today, there are coaching classes and earning the CA
qualification is tough, but not that tough. I know of many Marwari girls who
have now earned a CA degree.
You know he
did his B.Com and CA together. From Sydenham College he moved to HR College,
which had morning classes. It was a tough slog for him, juggling two academic
programs side-by-side.
Of course,
hard work, perseverance, rigour, meticulous attention to detail, a degree of
seriousness and integrity were his hallmarks then and are his defining
characteristics even today. But I think all mothers get tense and worried when children
take exams. Having said that, Adityaji was absolutely confident and was sure
that for Kumar Mangalam it would be no problem.
What about his MBA from London?
In contrast,
when Kumar Mangalam enrolled for his MBA at the London Business School, I was
not at all worried. Adityaji and I were more than certain that he would make
the grade. Neerja went along with him to London and that kind of gave us great
comfort and a sense of reassurance. She helped him enormously every which way.
And they quickly settled into a groove. Still at 24, Kumar Mangalam was by far
the youngest in the class. He did brilliantly.
His entire
educational trajectory was charted out by Adityaji and Kumar Mangalam never
questioned it. He had blind faith in his father and idolised him.
What about Vasavadatta?
For parents
of our generation, being protective of the girl child was the norm. Even for
Vasavadatta, Adityaji decided what course she would pursue. So, after
graduation, he felt she should go to Switzerland’s finest finishing school.
Vasavadatta was also happy to do so.
She has done
the Montessori course at Sophia College (Mumbai University). She feels that
this course, which is primarily a teacher’s program, has helped her raise her
kids — my grandchildren Anandmayi, Yugadikrit and Vishwarupe. Kushagra (Bajaj),
my son-in-law, backs her to the hilt.
Is it still a man’s world?
(Laughs)
Changing, albeit at a slow pace. But if you are educated, you have the
intelligence, the wit and the verve, you can pull it off. In life, I believe
you have to find your own trail, you shouldn’t let your (woman’s) identity be
subsumed into the man’s, whatever your relationship.
Living one’s passion
Today the
world is nowhere near to the world that we knew as young parents. Distances
don’t matter. Children leave the comfort of their homes in their teens itself
to study abroad. Technology is such a marvel, you can talk whenever you want
and you can Skype whenever you want to see them. It’s so different.
Adityaji
could choose courses for Kumar Mangalam and Vasavadatta. Today’s children are
encouraged to pursue their passion and fulfil their dreams. My grand-daughter,
Ananyashree, took a sabbatical to found Svatantra Microfinance Limited, an
NBFC. Currently, she is studying at the Oxford University. Kumar Mangalam could
have never dreamt of taking a sabbatical. But Neerja and he went with her
dreams. Adityaji and I would have been startled if our children would have
wanted a break after their board exams. All straightjacket thinking, but now
the times are changing.
Your role model?
No single
role model as such. I find life is a journey where you meet so many interesting
people. Many of them have uniqueness, a trait which I begin to admire, and that
influences me as I move on. Having said that, the three people who cast a spell
on me are: Ma (Dr. Sarala Birla), my husband Adityaji, and now for nearly two
decades, Kumar Mangalam (my son).
Ma (Dr.
Sarala Birla): She has an indomitable spirit. She symbolises commitment,
passion, integrity and compassion. Apart from being one of the finest
educationists, having established more than 20 schools, she is a woman of
substance, a highly spiritual person. Even today at 86, she is extremely
sprightly and very active. Not a single lazy bone in her. She is a great source
of inspiration for me and many, many others.
My husband
Adityaji was my greatest guru. I was engaged at 10 and married at 17, that was
kind of expected. So, I would go to Birla Park in Calcutta and have a wonderful
time with his two sisters — Jayashreebai and Manjushreebai. It was much, much
later, and only during the last few months, when Adityaji was at MIT, that we
started writing letters to one another, after being permitted to do so by our
respective parents. He was 21 and I was 17 when we got married. The early years
he was very busy putting up factories in India and outside. He was an
absolutely doting father to Kumar Mangalam and Vasavadatta.
A true
karmayogi, there was a uniqueness to Adityaji. Beyond dynamism. Beyond vision.
So much of compassion. He had a lot of positive energy, the passion and the
edge to do something for the underprivileged, besides his companies’
stakeholders. It wasn’t cheque book philanthropy. I deeply admired these
traits. And that then had a resonance in my own life, moulding it in so many
ways.
A bit on the concept of Karmayogi
The concept
of the karmayogi is beautifully explained in the Gita. Comments Aldous Huxley —
“The Gita is one of the clearest and most comprehensive summaries of the
Perennial Philosophy ever to have been done. Hence, its enduring value, not
only for Indians, but all mankind… The Bhagavad Gita is perhaps the most
systematic spiritual statement of the Perennial Philosophy.”
On all
counts, the Gita is the stairway to a higher purpose in life. It teaches how to
transcend oneself through contemplation, self-control and meditation, and
compassion as well. All of which help quieten the chatter of the mind, which
ceaselessly flits from one issue to the other. The Gita teaches you how to
master the mind through following the path that it enshrines. It transposes you
to an entirely higher plane, giving you inner peace and a kind of tranquillity.
Today, more than ever, most people, all over the world, are seekers of this
inner peace. People have begun to realise the need for self-control in the
midst of unrelenting stress.
We as a
family look upon the Gita as our spiritual guide. Our aspiration is to try and
reach the exalted level of the true karmayogi. (That’s the secret of
Rajashreeji’s calm, unhurried, unflappable self, always brimming with
patience.) In fact, Adityaji and I grew up in the spirit of the Gita. Both of
us listened to the discourses on the Bhagvad Gita. It gives you an inner
strength, a sense of equanimity and fortitude. It helped me cope with the
passing away of Adityaji. He was the noblest of the noble. But we did not ask
God, why him? We accepted God’s will unconditionally. I read the Gita
regularly. And this has percolated. Kumar Mangalam and Neerja hold a satsang
every week at home with a group of their friends. During the two-hour satsang,
the focus is on spirituality and the teachings of the Gita.
As a parent,
I see a lot of compassion, goodness and nobility of character in Kumar Mangalam
and Neerja. And I see these values percolating to my grandchildren —
Ananyashree, Aryaman and Advaitesha. I admire the way they are growing up. If,
as parents, we follow the straight and narrow path, if we keep doing the right
thing, children are bound to imbibe those values from you. Of course,
ultimately we do what we can do — give the best of values and the best of
education. If these two are in place, everything else will fall in line.
On wealth
As a family,
we subscribe to the trusteeship concept — the wealth that is generated is to be
held for larger purposes. Quite honestly, how much money one needs is a
difficult question. People would tend to say whatever is the comfort level for
them. Money is important up to a point. Thinking beyond yourself and helping
others and making this a part of your life makes me feel good. I think it is a
good thing to do.
Running a business?
After
Adityaji’s demise, Kumar Mangalam suggested that I look after a few units. Very
quickly I realised that I was not cut out for business and I told him so. Then,
a year down the line (1997), we set up the Aditya Birla Centre for Community
Initiatives and Rural Development. Our CSR projects became structured and very
meaningful. I find that our work in communities and my involvement has endowed
my life with a sense of purpose.
The book on your bedside table?
I believe
that if you view life through the lens of a positive prism, you will only be
greeted with positivity. I have found that reading books like Don’t sweat the
small stuff..... and it’s all small stuff by Richard Carlson, Joy 24x7 by the
spiritual master Sadhguru, Seven Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen
Covey, also help enormously in stoking positive thoughts, which enable us to go
with the flow. So these kinds of books occupy my shelves.
Wanderlust
Every year,
we head off to some exotic destination and explore new countries. We are a
bunch of buddies who travel together and press the limits in exploring new
geographies and exotic places. So we have been to Australia, Croatia, New
Zealand, Canada, the Rockies, South America, South Africa, China, Egypt and
Turkey. We will head off to Japan soon. It’s a lot of fun and every place just
amazes me, and I see myself soaking in their culture and their history. In a
manner of speaking, these are wonderful learning expeditions too, and great
leisure pursuits.
You dream of
An India free from poverty. In the villages, and elsewhere, when you see men
and women ravaged by poverty, it hurts. We have seen all this. With the right
focus on inclusive growth in the foreseeable future, this is not a pipe dream.
And of course a world with more of peace and minimal conflict. Utopia? Is it?
(Reproduced with the permission of Dr.
Pragnya Ram, Editor, ‘Aditya’, the management journal of the Aditya Birla Group).
Saturday, 18 April 2015
Narendra None-2: Political Sandwich!
S Narendra,
former advisor to PM, recounts his
experiences during change of guard at PMO
experiences during change of guard at PMO
Working as
government PR point person when power gets transferred from one political order
to another is very tricky. I was caught in this uncertain situation in May
1996, when BJP formed the government and lasted for 13 days.
I was
Spokesperson for the government of India as well as information adviser to PM..
The gracious BJP leader, Atal Behari Vajpayijee received me very cordially
when I called on him and told me that I should continue to function as before.
His I&B minister Smt Sushma Swaraj was equally gracious and was highly
supportive.
However,
there were many others who were keen to replace me - few with themselves! They
were carrying tales against me and had branded me as a Congress fellow traveler.
It was no fault of mine that Congress party was in power longer than any others
and as part of permanent civil service, I had served governments that happened
to belong to the Congress.
One of the
charges against me that had surfaced was that as the government spokesperson, I
had kept in readiness a draft speech to be delivered by Narasimha Rao, soon
after his swearing in after the 1996 elections. It is customary for newly sworn
in PM to make a national broadcast, and I was supposed to have assumed that Rao
would be reelected as PM. A secondary accusation was also in circulation
stating that being a Kannadiga, I had kept ready a draft speech for Janata
party candidate Devegowdaji, as PM. It
was conveniently ignored that the latter was a last minute compromise choice by
John front, after Christmas had vetoed Joti Basu's candidacy.
It took
little time for such allegations to acquire velocity. I was more than willing
to step down from my position but Smt Swaraj and senior Journalist TV R Shenoy,
who was close to BJP leadership, assured me that there was no move to replace
me. But the story that I had prepared in advance draft speeches for Rao and
Devegowdaji continued to make the rounds.
abundant precaution, I had submitted the file containing all the three drafts to the outgoing I&B minister P A Sangma and even obtained his signature. When I showed this file with the ex –minister’s signature to Smt Swaraj, that also contained a draft speech for BJP leader, she had a hearty laugh. Next day, she went on to announce that the government had no plans to replace me, as it had full confidence in me.
The PM
Vajpayijee personally spoke to me to tell me that I was doing my job as
expected by the government: “Humko galat
soochana deegayithi. app apna kaam theek kar rahe hain" There is more to this 13 days
official Spokesmanship. But in the next installment!
Wednesday, 15 April 2015
Spoof! Newstainment with a Twist!
Have the news channels become entertainment channels?.
I am not the only person to ask that.
In fact, TV News anchor Rajdeep Sardesai himself told us
at our Mumbai conclave in February 2014 that one could turn to News Channels
for entertainment!
The news channels seem to be losing their seriousness. In
fact, BJP boycotted NDTV during the poll campaign on the pretext that the
channel was not fair to them. Today, we hear some spokespersons threatening
Times Now that they will not come to the channel as they are not allowed to
speak.
Even a student of mass communication feels that the news
channels are not doing the right thing.
My daughter, then doing her masters in mass
communication, had this experience during a guest talk by Rajdeep. At the end
of the talk and the Q & A, she musters enough courage and ask Rajdeep: Sir, why
do some of you anchors do not allow your panelists to respond.
Rajdeep passes this question to Sagarika.
My daughter says: She is even worse!
Let me narrate another anecdote.
We had this interesting debate during the Press Club
Mumbai’s Red Ink Awards for excellence in journalism last year.
Arnab, Rajdeep, Kumar Ketkar were the panelists and
Piyush Pande, Chairman of Ogilvy, and Uday Shankar, Star TV CEO, were the moderators
or anchors.
Uday began by saying: Arnab, Rajdeep and Kumar. The rules
of this debate are: I will ask you a question. I will not allow you to answer
and I will ask you more questions.
Arnab: Uday, you have begun it well. But you forgot one
more rule of the game. You will ask a question. Answer it yourself. And ask
more questions….
The topic was: ‘Elections 2014: Were We Fair, Or Did We
Stoke the NaMo Wave?’
While Arnab and Rajdeep went about discussing the media’s
role on propelling the wave, Piyush interrupted ….you may remember that it was
Piyush’s Ogilvy that coined the catch phrase: Achhay Din Aanay Walay Hain.
Piyush said: Arnab and Rajdeep, please don’t credit
yourselves for the wave. None of us created or stoked it. WE JUST RODE THE
WAVE!
So much for credit snatchers and those who claim the
highest TRPs.
It was interesting to see that all channels were claiming
the Number 1 viewership position after the election results.
It is equally interesting to watch anchors like Rajdeep
Sardesai attacking the race for TRPs among news channels?
We have called them the noise channels long ago.
Here is how it will look if we have a debate among news
anchors and political party spokespersons.
Let me present an imaginary debate and let me start with
a disclaimer: This debate that I am going to narrate is purely imaginary and fictitious
and not to be taken seriously at all.
Don’t
blame me if you find it real!
Now, the debate begins something like this.
Rajdeep: My son does not watch news channels.
Arnab Goswami: The nation wants to know why!
Barkha Dutt: It is quite sad. Don’t you feel terrible
about it? It must be really disturbing.
Rajdeep: In this race for TRPs, we seem to be losing out.
We are losing sense in sensationalizing the news.
Print journalist Kumar Ketkar: For you, everything is
breaking news.
Rajdeep: Yes, Arvind Kejriwal leaves home…breaking
news….Kejriwal reaches Jantar Mantar….breaking news
Arnab: I will not take this. You cannot pass judgement
against me on my channel. My viewers know me well.
Barkha: We have different standards. But we can’t live in
isolation.
Rajdeep: Breaking news is breaking down.
Karan Thapar: It is particularly disturbing to see all
kinds of nonsense. You must explain.
Prannoy Roy: We have spent 25 years in reporting the news…they
say the dot makes all the difference….Now let me ask my young friends on what
they think of the news.
Rajdeep: My so does not watch news channels.
Arnab: Never ever. Never. Ever. Never Ever. Say such
things. My viewers know me well. Now, let me open up this debate and….let me take
this call from Chikamagalur.
Manish Tewari: With regards to your call, how many people
watch English news channels? My information is that people in places like Eluru
or Chakimagalur or Jumri Talayya do not even get to see English or Hindi news
channels.
Rajdeep: Yes, regional media is exploding. But does this
TRP race is spreading among them as well.
Barkha: I was in Kashmir. I could freely speak in English.
Arnab: Everyone on my channel speaks English. My Hindi
isn’t all that good.
Mayank Gandhi (of AAP): The nation need not know this.
Karan Thapar (tightening his teeth): But, but….dont you
think it is highly irresponsible on part of some viewers not to watch TV
channels?
Arnab: This is undemocratic. The nation wants to know why
this selective black out is happening.
Prannoy (holding his chin with his right palm): Let them
have the freedom to chose what they want.
Rajdeep: Only in my newsroom, do we watch 20 news
channels. And we have some 483 channels airing the news 24x7.
Subramaniam Swamy: Don’t say it so loud. Some parties
will give multiple TV sets as freebies during the poll campaign.
Raghav Behl: That will be good for the economy. The FMCG
industry may see growth. Dalal Street will look up.
Arnab, Barkha, Karan and Rajdeep try to say something and
all that we could hear is noise. Swamy, Tewari and Gandhi just smile away.
-BNK
Sunday, 12 April 2015
PRCI forms guest faculty pool for BMM colleges
Public relations Council of
India (PRCI) has embarked on a novel project - The Guest Faculty Pool to help Mass
Communication colleges impart practical training to their students.
The project, launched on a
pilot basis by the Mumbai Chapter of PRCI, has evoked tremendous response. It
has been launched as a national project at the 8th Global
Communication Conclave- Mumbai on February 15, 2014.
PR professionals,
journalists and corporate trainers volunteered to join the pool and share their
practical experiences with the upcoming young professionals.
PRCI got in touch with
various mass communication teaching institutions offering the facility.
PRCI hopes that the project
will help BMM and other colleges offering degree./diploma courses in tackling
the shortage of teaching faculty. Since the focus will mainly be on practical
knowledge and case study presentations, the Pool will be tremendous use in
keeping the students up-to-date with the developments in their chosen foelds –
be it advertising, PR, and journalism.
Our stress will be more on
practical aspects than mere theoretical ones. We will deal with Public
Relations, Crisis Communications, Reporting and Editing Skills and above all
asking the right questions!
We at PRCI invite
experienced PR and media professionals to join in and strengthen the pool.
The particulars may please
be filled in this format for ready reference.
|
Sr
No
|
Name
of Faculty member
|
Areas
of specialization/Interest
|
Brief
|
City
|
PRCI will scrutinize the list and
ten recommend the guest faculty to the mass media colleges. PRCI has already
begun to map the faculty as per their geographies, matching them with the Mass
Media colleges.
PRCI Chairman Emeritus and Chief Mentor M B Jayaram formed the following coordinators for giving a national shape to the Guest Faculty Pool and they will work the President – National Executive for finalizing the
formalities.
Contact:
Coordinators
- Masscom Guest Faculty Pool
|
National
Coordinator
|
Dr
K R Venugopal
|
+91
98440 36885
venugopalkr@gmail.com
|
|
Regional
Coordinator - North
|
Ms
Renuka Salwan
|
renuka.bis@gmail.com
|
|
Regional
Coordinator - East
|
Mr
B K Sahu
|
sahu.bibhatsu@gmail.com
|
|
Regional
Coordinator - West
|
Mr
Amit Tripathi
|
+91
98200 87149
amit@id8labs.com
|
|
Regional
Coordinator - South
|
Ms
Geetha Shankar
|
+91
97421 68570
Geethashankar2007@gmail.com
|
Thursday, 9 April 2015
Future shock for media! Social Media overtaking fast
Narendra None
Introducing a column by S. Narendra* ((Former PIO and ex-adviser to Govt. of Karnataka)
Introducing a column by S. Narendra* ((Former PIO and ex-adviser to Govt. of Karnataka)
Who's there? I, so and so
(with a given name), that's how we identify ourselves all our life. .But in the
next decade, the world's virtual population will exceed the population of the
Earth. People's multiple virtual identities will overlap their physical identities,
such as given names. At another level, where we get our information and what (information
and news) sources we trust will have a profound impact on our future
identities. What's in store for news on Internet is known and the battles over
information monetization strategies and content syndication will continue. But
as entry barriers for new information and news providers and their aggregators
get lower, how will it affect the media landscape?
It is clear that mainstream
media, such as news channels, newspapers and news agencies, will always be a
step behind in reporting news. The world's breaking news will continually come
from platforms like Twitter, and its competitors: open networks that facilitate
information sharing instantly, widely and in accessible packages.
As more and
more people use data enabled devices, who breaks the news is a matter of
chance. Unknowingly, a civilian live tweeted the killing of Osama bin Laden
from Abbotabad.
The lag time before the
mainstream media can get the story will alter the nature of audiences and their
loyalty, as they seek more immediate methods of information delivery. Every
generation will be able to produce and consume more information than the
previous generation. This will lead to splitting of loyalty between new
platforms for breaking news and the established organisation for the rest of
the story.
News organizations will
remain an important and integral part of society but many outlets will not
survive in their current form. The effect of having so many new actors involved
in news reporting through a range of online platforms into the great, diffuse
media system, is that major outlets will report less and validate more.
Reporting duties will become
more widely distributed, while expanding the scope of coverage but probably
reduce the quality on a net level. The role of mainstream media will primarily
be one of a credibility filter. But competition for being first with breaking
news is diluting the role of filters. So also the wide presence of hand held
devices enables thousand of sources to contribute to the pile of breaking news.
Here, particularly for the elite - validation and cogent analysis will be
important. The strength of open, unregulated information sharing platforms is
their responsiveness, not their insight or depth.
Mainstream media will have to
find ways to integrate all of the new global voices they can reach, a
challenging but necessary task. The business of Journalism will become less
extractive and more collaborative. Of course, chances of errors may also rise.
Global connectivity will
introduce entirely new contributors to the supply chain. One new subcategory to
emerge will be a network of local technical encryption specialists who deal
exclusively in encryption keys. They will provide the necessary confidentiality
mechanism between parties. In the Middle East, several VPNs or virtual private
networks have come up and accessed by locals and international news outlets.
Stringers serve such networks.
As part of cost cutting,
mainstream media reduced their staff for foreign news coverage and began to
rely more on stringers. In New Delhi, for example, most foreign correspondents
working for newspapers and other outlets are stringers, who are paid a retainer
plus a payment on contribution basis. Another type of stringers had emerged in
India during the height of militancy and violence in Punjab and J&K.Foreign
agencies paid stringers for tipping them off about violence, including barbaric
killings by militants in remote rural areas.
![]() |
| The Author: S Narendra |
Sometimes even militants
themselves had turned stringers to gain international coverage for their acts. Mostly
they were using the then latest technology, STD. For increasing coverage of
hinterland, AIR uses dozens of stringers.
In the same way, a new type
of Stringers will emerge. The latter risk their lives and offer digital content
and online sources of news. But media outlets will have to exercise greater
caution and seek validation for their news from such sources.
When people find the
mainstream media failing to cover conflicts or other such developments,
celebrities or even ordinary people, may start their own online portals. Mainstream media will find such new serious
competitors in the future. Many will still favour and support the established
media outlets out of loyalty and trust in institutions and the serious work of
journalism. There will always be demand for not so serious tabloid variety of
content.
Just as they do today, with
charities and business (even governments) ventures, celebrities will look to
starting their own media outlets as a logical extension of their 'brand'. Not
only technology is enabling this but also it does not involve much investment.
Loyalties are fickle when it comes to media. That trend will get exacerbated
when the field is crowded. If errors in content occur, that will further erode
the audience loyalty.
Expanded connectivity
promises more than just challenges for media outlets. It offers new
possibilities for the role of media particularly in countries where the media
is not free. Connectivity helps upend control over media by corrupt regimes,
especially where local encryption facilities crop up and NGOs become active.
Assisted by NGOs outside the country, the local ones find their voices. This
kind of disaggregated, mutually anonymous news gathering system would not be
difficult to build. Two new trends are-""safer reporting backed by
encryptiop" and a wider readership,
international, due to gains in
connectivity ' would challenge oppressive or corrupt regimes. Green activists
(even non-five star ones) have used the new information platforms very
effectively to network and challenge administrations and businesses that ignore
environmental and health safety considerations). *(Based on New Digital Age by Eric Schmidt and Jared
Cohen)
=======================================================================
About the author
S Narendra has
been Information adviser to the PM, Principal Information Officer to Govt Of
India and Government Spokesperson. Has worked in both public and private
sectors in the fields of Advertising, PR, Journalism, Communication Research.
Now, heads
own Communication Consultancy. Has been associated with Communication projects
of UNICEF, UNAIDS, World Bank, Gates Foundation, UNFPA, EU etc.,
Tuesday, 7 April 2015
PRCI focus on skill development & going global
Masterstroke Interview with B.N.Kumar, National
President,Public Relations Council of India (PRCI)
April 7, 2015 Richa Seth Interviews. Vikypedia Exclusives
Public Relations Council of India (PRCI), a premier
industry body of PR, advertising, HR and media professionals and academicians,
has appointed Concept PR Executive Director B N Kumar (BNK for friends) as its
next national president. Earlier, BNK led Mumbai chapter of PRCI and was the
national vice president. He has close to four decades of experience in mass
communications as a journalist and PR professional. In the words of PRCI
Chairman Emeritus and Chief Mentor M B Jayaram, “BNK has been taking active
interest in furthering the cause of our oganisation and he led two successful
Global Communication Conclaves at Mumbai.” “As the programme committee chairman
of the just concluded 9th Conclave, he played an exemplary role in ensuring its
success.”
In this free and frank exclusive interview with Richa
Seth, BNK, who has close to four decades of Media and PR experience, talks
about his vision for PRCI and the industry. Excerpts:
1. In your new role, what are the initiatives that you
would like to undertake? Please elaborate?
I firmly believe in inclusive communication. I would like
to involve all of PRCI chapters. We have quite a few initiatives on hand. In Mumbai, we floated a Guest Faculty pool
for mass communication colleges which, as we all know, have teacher shortage.
Experienced professionals from our pool will be sent to colleges on request to
give practical training to PR and journalism students. We are glad to have some
fine journalists in our pool. We would now like to spread this across major
centres.
During the 9th Global Communication Conclave, we received
a suggestion to help private and public sector companies train their new PR
professionals. We are ready to take this up. As they say in Sanskrit,
‘Spardhaya Vardhanti Vidya’ (Knowledge improves by discussion). At PRCI we have
initiated Knowledge Forums. We would like to further this by holding seminars
and discussions on current issues that confront the media and communication
industry. Along with the Press Club-Mumbai and BARC, we did couple of media
seminars on Radiation and Urban Garbage Management.
Yes, I must tell you about our unique e-mag. It’s neither
weekly, nor monthly or quarterly. It’s online and gets updated on a 24×7 basis.
PRapport or prrapport.blogspot.in has
quickly caught the imagination of communication professionals in India and
abroad. Here, we report not only on PRCI activities, but discuss issues related
to our profession.
We have a youth wing
called YCC or Young Communicators Club
which provides a platform for journalism and PR students to strengthen their
knowledge. Our target is to spread YCC activities to all BMM and other mass
communication colleges.
2. As the adage goes, ‘PR has a PR problem’, how do you
think PRCI can help to build the reputation and value of PR among C level
executives?
Rapport is the solution. As you said, we also suffer from
communication problems. Most of us do not communicate. We cannot afford to
function in isolation. This is where the top management participation in our
programmes significance. We will continue to communicate with the C level
executives through Corporate Communications and HR professionals who are our
members. Simultaneously, we will focus on corporate memberships and their
participation. We have couple of other initiatives. You will soon see action.
Please keep a watch on http://prrapport.blogspot.in/
3. What are the initiatives that PRCI will take to
connect with the youth community and get them more involved?
We already discussed the YCC initiative. We would like partner other forums like
Mediaforum. We also have advanced skill training programmes for the upcoming
professionals. This generation is blessed with technology. We would like to use
it to the hilt. We also have awards for young professionals to encourage their
talent. In a first of its kind initiative, we would like to support the BMM and
other PR and journalism colleges with internships at our member companies.
4. Largely PR industry bodies are often seen as populated
with members of PSUs, what will be your strategy to get members from across the
board?
We firmly believe in going with both public and private
sector companies. You can see from the response that we get for the various
programmes and awards – both PSUs and private companies respond well. If you
look at PRCI’s signature Chanakya Award winners in various categories, you will
realize that PRCI is for all sectors – PSU, private, SME and even startups.
5. Could you share details about the advanced skill
development modules that PRCI is planning to launch for private and public
sector companies?
Good question. We will draw resources from across and
help companies make their new and young PR professionals industry ready.
Everyone knows about media and nobody knows media enough. With this in mind, we
can run media familiarization programmes on what makes news and what doesn’t,
what to expect from media, how to write press releases, the importance of
online media and so on. We are developing PRraport into a web site which will
also serve as a knowledge forum.
6. What do you think are the challenges faced by the PR
industry today and how can it be overcome?
Challenges are quite a few. There is no fun in working
without any challenge. On a serious note, I think the biggest challenge is the
credibility. We are at cross roads of credibility in view of the recent
developments which I need not name. Corporate governance, transparency and
ethical practices are among the issues that confront us as communication
practitioners. Designing media acceptable communication is another challenge.
Every company wants its news in Times of India and The
Economic Times. Even I would like this interview to appear in top papers. Is it
possible? Everybody wants to be a Thought Leader. They need to realize that it
doesn’t happen overnight. Many companies and their Corporate Communications
departments lay so much of stress on English media that the overkill proves
counterproductive. Many often neglect the regional media. We do business in
rural India but when it comes to media, all of us want the news only on English
media. Also, we need to impress upon the corporates that PR should be used as
an interface and not as an interference tool.
In these days when scams are the flavour of the season,
getting a negative story stopped from getting into print or breaking news is
just impossible. As we say in our media training sessions, ‘Asking a journalist
to kill a story is like asking him not to do his job’. Managements need to be
educated on this. Close rapport between Corporate Communication professionals
and journalists is a must. To give you an example, we had Prasar Bharati
Chairman, General Secretary of the Editors’ Guild of India and Director General
of Cellular Operators’ Association of India addressing the PRCI’s 9th Global
Communication Conclave at Delhi. Our rapport with the media can be exemplified
from the fact that late Vinod Mehta inaugurated PRCI ten years ago at
Bengaluru. And, year on year, we have been having senior journalists like Arnab
Goswami, Rajdeep Sardesai, Chandan Mitra, later M V Kamath, Kumar Ketkar, Barkha
Dutt, Prakash Akolkar and Ayaz Memon participating in our programmes.
7. Your advice for the youngsters in the industry?
Many of our young professionals do not read. Though they
are blessed with Google, they try short cuts. Many even do not know how to write
mails and whom to address their communication. For instance, what is the point
in sending the press release about an obscure award to the Managing Editor of
Business India? And the, these young kids call him up and ask: “Sir which beat
do you cover?” As late Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh told us during the
inauguration of the Press Club building, young media persons, particularly from
TV channels do not how to ask questions. Don’t we remember the infamous case of
a TV journalist asking the Union Home Minister, after taking his byte: Sir what
is your name and designation?! The same is applicable to PR professionals too.
How many of our young PR professionals know that Eenadu is published from
Mumbai and Delhi as well? How many of us realize that even the less circulated
newspapers are read by the editors of large papers? I may be sounding harsh but
the hard reality is we don’t like to do any hard work and we always try for
shortcuts.
8. Finally, as a
veteran of close to four decades of experience, what do you think is the future
of PR industry?
Man is a social animal. We cannot live without
communicating. PR industry is evolving by the day and I firmly believe that
this industry has a great scope. And we at PRCI would like to play the role of
a catalyst in making the industry play a meaningful role in the country’s
socio-economic change. If India has to emerge as the Numero Uno nation by 2025,
PR has to play its role across the board – industry, governments, urban areas
and villages.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










.jpg)
